Idaho Human Rights Commission Statistics FY2015

Skip Sperry Blog 1 Comment

Today I attended a continuing legal education seminar for the Idaho State Bar Employment and Labor Law Section. Linda Goodman, Administrator/Director of the Idaho Human Rights Commission, was the presenter. I thought some of the statistics she presented were worth passing on.

During the Commission’s 2015 fiscal year, 443 new cases were filed, up from 435 in fiscal year 2014. Of the 443 new cases, 414 were employment related. The following table shows what categories of employment discrimination the cases alleged:

     FY2014    FY2015 
Discharge (actual or constructive)   64%  71%
Sexual harassment  15%  17%
Harassment/intimidation 31% 26%
Failure to accommodate a disability 17% 24%
Terms & conditions of employment 17% 13%

The cases were further broken down into protected categories as follows (some cases allege more than one basis of discrimination, so the precentages do not equal 100%):

      FY2014    FY2015 
Disability     185 (42%)    187 (42%)
Sex  156 (35%) 146 (35%)
Retaliation  126 (29%) 135 (30%)
Age 78 (18%) 74 (17%)
National Origin    47 (11%) 46 (10%)
Race 22 ( 5%) 33 ( 7%)
Religion 19 ( 4%) 17 ( 4%)

The disability claims in 2015 involved discriminatory discharge in 86% of the charges and failure to accommodate in 51% of the charges.

The sex discrimination claims alleged discriminatory conduct against females in 62% of the charges, on the basis of pregnancy in 18% of the charges, against males in 16% of the charges, on the basis of sexual orientation in 2% and on the basis of gender identity or expression in 1% of the charges.

The national origin claims alleged discrimination against Mexicans in 20%, against Hispanics in 30%, against Middle Eastern people in 2%, and against “other” national origins in 49% of the cases filed.

Finally, the race cases involved discrimination against Blacks in 45%, against Asians in 18%, against whites in 18%, and against American Indians in 18% of the race claims filed.

Retaliation continues to be a big hitter among the cases received by the Commission.  Sometimes even when there is no discriminatory conduct, employers may take some adverse action against an employee after she or he makes a complaint (internal or external).  This retaliatory conduct then provides legitimate grounds for the employee’s case.

During 2015, the Commission resolved 494 cases, and the table below shows their disposition:

     FY2014     FY2015 
No probably cause finding  74% 72%
Mediation, settlement, successful conciliation  17% 15%
Conciliation failure .4% 1.4%
Other (no jurisdiction, notice fo right to sue without findings, etc.)   7.8% 11%

The Commission has been busy.  Your company should take the opportunity now to review your policies, procedures, and treatment of all employees to ensure your workplace is free from discrimination.  If you have any questions or need help, please let me know.

Comments 1

  1. I filed age and retaliation may 2016 and there still has not been a ruling. So your numbers would not be accurate due to the amount of cases filed many ate still being investigated

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.